Home
Hadith
Hadith 35345
Yahya related to me that Malik said, "What is done in our
community in the case of a man who makes his slave-girl a mudabbara
and she gives birth to children after that, and then the slave-girl
dies before the one who gave her a tadbir is that her children are in
her position. The conditions which were confirmed for her are
confirmed for them. The death of their mother does not harm them. If
the one who made her mudabbara dies, they are free if their value is
less than one third of his total property."
Malik said, "For
every mother by birth as opposed to mother by suckling, her children
are in her position. If she is free and she gives birth after she is
free, her children are free. If she is a mudabbara or mukataba, or
freed after a number of years in service, or part of her is free or
pledged or she is an umm walad, each of her children are in the same
position as their mother. They are set free when she is set free and
they are slaves when she is a slave."
Malik said about the
mudabbara given a tadbir while she was pregnant, "Her children are in
her position. That is also the position of a man who frees his slave-
girl while she is pregnant and does not know that she is pregnant."
Malik said, "The sunna about such women is that their
children follow them and are set free by their being set free."
Malik said, "It is the same as if a man had bought a slave-girl
while she was pregnant. The slave-girl and what is in her womb belong
to the one who bought her whether or not the buyer stipulates that."
Malik continued, "It is not halal for the seller to make an
exception about what is in her womb because that is an uncertain
transaction. It reduces her price and he does not know if that will
reach him or not. That is as if one sold the foetus in the womb of the
mother. That is not halal because it is an uncertain transaction ."
Malik said about the mukatab or mudabbar who bought a slave-
girl and had intercourse with her and she became pregnant by him and
gives birth, "The children of both of them by a slave-girl are in his
position. They are set free when he is set free and they are slaves
when he is a slave."
Malik said, "When he is set free, the
umm walad is part of his property which is surrendered to him when he
is set free."
Muwatta Malik Book 40, Hadith 1
← Previous Hadith
Malik said, The best of what I have heard about a mukatab whose
master frees him at death, is that the mukatab is valued according to
what he would fetch if he were sold. If that value is less than what
remains against him of his kitaba, his freedom is taken from the third
that the deceased can bequeath. One does not look at the number of
dirhams which remain against him in his kitaba. That is because had he
been killed, his killer would not be in debt for other than his value
on the day he killed him. Had he been injured, the one who injured him
would not be liable for other than the blood-money of the injury on
the day of his injury. One does not look at how much he has paid of
dinars and dirhams of the contract he has written because he is a
slave as long as any of his kitaba remains. If what remains in his
kitaba is less than his value, only whatever of his kitaba remains
owing from him is taken into account in the third of the property of
the deceased. That is because the deceased left him what remains of
his kitaba and so it becomes a bequest which the deceased made."
Malik said, "The illustration of that is that if the price of the
mukatab is one thousand dirhams, and only one hundred dirhams remain
of his kitaba, his master leaves him the one hundred dirhams which
complete it for him. It is taken into account in the third of his
master and by it he becomes free."
Malik said that if a man
wrote his slave a kitaba at his death, the value of the slave was
estimated. If there was enough to cover the price of the slave in one
third of his property, that was permitted for him.
Malik
said, "The illustration of that is that the price of the slave is one
thousand dinars. His master writes him a kitaba for two hundred dinars
at his death. The third of the property of his master is one thousand
dinars, so that is permitted for him. It is only a bequest which he
makes from one third of his property. If the master has left bequests
to people, and there is no surplus in the third after the value of the
mukatab, one begins with the mukatab because the kitaba is setting
free, and setting free has priority over bequests. When those bequests
are paid from the kitaba of the mukatab, they follow it. The heirs of
the testator have a choice. If they want to give the people with
bequests all their bequests and the kitaba of the mukatab is theirs,
they have that. If they refuse and hand over the mukatab and what he
owes to the people with bequests they can do that, because the third
commences with the mukatab and because all the bequests which he makes
are as one."
If the heirs then say, "What our fellow
bequeathed was more than one third of his property and he has taken
what was not his," Malik said, "His heirs choose. It is said to them,
'Your companion has made the bequests you know about and if you would
like to give them to those who are to receive them according to the
deceased's bequests, then do so. If not, hand over to the people with
bequests one third of the total property of the deceased.' "
Malik continued, "If the heirs surrender the mukatab to the people
with bequests, the people with bequests have what he owes of his
kitaba. If the mukatab pays what he owes of his kitaba, they take that
in their bequests according to their shares. If the mukatab cannot
pay, he is a slave of the people with bequests and does not return to
the heirs because they gave him up when they made their choice, and
because when he was surrendered to the people with bequests, they were
liable. If he died, they would not have anything against the heirs. If
the mukatab dies before he pays his kitaba and he leaves property
which is more than what he owes, his property goes to the people with
bequests. If the mukatab pays what he owes, he is free and his wala'
returns to the paternal relations of the one who wrote the kitaba for
him."
Malik spoke about a mukatab who owed his master ten
thousand dirhams in his kitaba, and when he died he remitted one
thousand dirhams from it. He said, "The mukatab is valued and his
value is taken into consideration. If his value is one thousand
dirhams and the reduction is a tenth of the kitaba, that portion of
the slave's price is one hundred dirhams. It is a tenth of the price.
A tenth of the kitaba is therefore reduced for him. That is converted
to a tenth of the price in cash. That is as if he had had all of what
he owed reduced for him. Had he done that, only the value of the slave
- one thousand dirhams - would have been taken into account in the
third of the property of the deceased. If that which he had remitted
is half of the kitaba, half the price is taken into account in the
third of the property of the deceased. If it is more or less than
that, it is according to this reckoning."
Malik said, "When a
man reduces the kitaba of his mukatab by one thousand dirhams at his
death from a kitaba of ten thousand dirhams, and he does not stipulate
whether it is from the beginning or the end of his kitaba, each
instalment is reduced for him by one tenth."
Malik said, "If
a man remits one thousand dirhams from his mukatab at his death from
the beginning or end of his kitaba, and the original basis of the
kitaba is three thousand dirhams, the mukatab's cash value is
estimated. Then that value is divided. That thousand which is from the
beginning of the kitaba is converted into its portion of the price
according to its proximity to the term and its precedence and then the
thousand which follows the first thousand is according to its
precedence also until it comes to its end, and every thousand is paid
according to its place in advancing and deferring the term because
what is deferred of that is less in respect of its price. Then it is
placed in the third of the deceased according to whatever of the price
befalls that thousand according to the difference in preference of
that, whether it is more or less, then it is according to this
reckoning."
Malik spoke about a man who willed a man a fourth
of a mukatab or freed a fourth, and then the man died and the mukatab
died and left a lot of property, more than he owed. He said, "The
heirs of the first master and the one who was willed a fourth of the
mukatab are given what they are still owed by the mukatab. Then they
divide what is left over, and the one willed a fourth has a third of
what is left after the kitaba is paid. The heirs of his master gets
two-thirds. That is because the mukatab is a slave as long as any of
his kitaba remains to be paid. He is inherited from by the possession
of his person."
Malik said about a mukatab whose master freed
him at death, "If the third of the deceased will not cover him, he is
freed from it according to what the third will cover and his kitaba is
decreased according to that. If the mukatab owed five thousand dirhams
and his value is two thousand dirhams cash, and the third of the
deceased is one thousand dirhams, half of him is freed and half of the
kitaba has been reduced for him." Malik said about a man who said in
his will, "My slave so-and-so is free and write a kitaba for so-and-
so", that the setting free had priority over the kitaba. Muwatta Malik Book 39, Hadith 15
Next Hadith →
Malik spoke about a mudabbar who said to his master, "Free me
immediately and I will give fifty dinars which I will have to pay in
instalments." His master said, "Yes. You are free and you must pay
fifty dinars, and you will pay me ten dinars every year." The slave
was satisfied with this. Then the master dies one, two or three days
after that. He said, "The freeing is confirmed and the fifty dinars
become a debt against him. His testimony is permitted, his
inviolability as a free man is confirmed, as are his inheritance and
his liability to the full hudud punishments. The death of his master,
however, does not reduce the debt for him at all."
Malik said
that if a man who made his slave a mudabbar died and he had some
property at hand and some absent property, and in the property at hand
there was not enough (in the third he was allowed to bequeath) to
cover the value of the mudabbar, the mudabbar was kept there together
with this property, and his tax (kharaj) was gathered until the
master's absent property was clear. Then if a third of what his master
left would cover his value, he was freed with his property and what
had gathered of his tax. If there was not enough to cover his value in
what his master had left, as much of him was freed as the third would
allow, and his property was left in his hands. Muwatta Malik Book 40, Hadith 2