Quran 89 : 5
Is in that (not) an oath for those who understand?
هَلْ
Hal
فِى
Fiā
ذَٰلِكَ
Dhaālika
قَسَمٌ
Qasamun
لِّذِى
Llidhiā
حِجْرٍ
Ḥijrin
Is there in that an oath for the mindful
There surely is an oath for thinking man
Is there in that an oath for a mindful man
Is there in that an oath for a man of sense
Is in that an oath to (those) of (E) a mind
Is there in this an oath for a man of sense?
Surely, in that is a mighty oath for the wise
Is there in this an oath for a rational person
is there an oath therein for one who is mindful
Is there in that an oath for he who is confined?
is this oath strong enough for a rational person
is there not in that an oath for the intelligent?
Why is there an oath in this, for the intelligent
Truly in this is an oath for men of understanding
Indeed in that there is an oath for a man of sense
Is in that (not) an oath for those who understand
Is there a (more solemn) vow for the sensible ones
A profound oath, for one who possesses intelligence
Is there not in it an oath for man of understanding?
Is there not in this an oath becoming a man of sense
Is there in this an oath for one with understanding?
Is this not a sufficient oath for intelligent people
Is there an oath in that for one possessing intellect
Does this contain an oath for those of understanding?
Is there not in this a mighty oath for a man of sense
Is there not in these an oath for those who understand
Is there not in this an oath formed with understanding
Is there an oath in that for one who has understanding?
Is there (not) in these a Sign for those who understand
is there not in this strong evidence for a man of sense
Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense
does that not contain an oath for someone who is mindful?
is there not in [all] that an oath for a rational person?
does that not contain an oath for someone who is mindful?
Is this not a sufficient oath for highly intelligent one?
Is this not a sufficient oath for highly intelligent one?
Is there in that an oath for a possessor of understanding?
Is there in this an oath for one endowed with understanding
Is not all this a solemn evidence for every thinking person
Is there within that an oath for a possessor of a mentality?
Is there not in this a (sufficient) oath for a man of reason?
Isn’t there a convincing oath for an intelligent person?
Is there any need for oath in this for anyone with understanding?
In these, can evidence not be found by those with understanding?
Truly in that there is an oath for those who possess understanding
Is in (all) this an evidence or testimony for a possessor of wisdom
For one who has sense, these (items) are surely worth being sworn by.
Is there not in it strong evidence for one possessed of understanding
Indeed in all these oaths there are subjects of thought for the thinkers
__Is there (not) in such an oath (enough assurance) for a man of sense?_
Is all this ˹not˺ a sufficient oath for those who have sense?
Is there (not) in these an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand
In it there is surely a strong evidence for one who has sense and understanding
Is there not in that an oath to be sworn for a possessor of intelligence?
Is there in that an oath for a sensible person? (Literally: person owning sense)
Is there not in these a lesson (evidence or admonition) for a man of understanding
Are there not in them (above oaths) sufficient proofs for the people of understanding?
Is there [not] in [all] that an oath [sufficient] for one of perception
Considering all this - could there be, to anyone endowed with reason, a [more] solemn evidence of the truth
Is there not in that a solemn oath for one endowed with reason (to reflect upon, so that it may guide him to the truth and keep him away from evils)
There is indeed in them (the above oaths) sufficient proofs for men of understanding (and that, they should avoid all kinds of sins and disbeliefs, etc.)