Is there in that an oath for he who is confined?

is this oath strong enough for a rational person

Are there not in them (above oaths) sufficient proofs for the people of understanding?

Indeed in that there is an oath for a man of sense

Is there not an evidence in this for those who have sense

Is there not in this a (sufficient) oath for a man of reason?

Is there not in it an oath for man of understanding?

is there not in that an oath for the intelligent?

Is there not in that a solemn oath for one endowed with reason (to reflect upon, so that it may guide him to the truth and keep him away from evils)

Is there an oath in that for one possessing intellect

In it there is surely a strong evidence for one who has sense and understanding

Is there in that an oath for a mindful man

Is there an oath in that for one who has understanding?

Indeed in all these oaths there are subjects of thought for the thinkers

Is there not in these an oath for those who understand

Is in that (not) an oath for those who understand

Is in (all) this an evidence or testimony for a possessor of wisdom

Is there not in that an oath to be sworn for a possessor of intelligence?

Surely, in that is a mighty oath for the wise

Is there a (more solemn) vow for the sensible ones

Is there in that an oath for a man of sense

Why is there an oath in this, for the intelligent

Is there any need for oath in this for anyone with understanding?

Is there not in this an oath formed with understanding

Is there not in these a lesson (evidence or admonition) for a man of understanding

Is there in that an oath for the mindful

There is indeed in them (the above oaths) sufficient proofs for men of understanding (and that, they should avoid all kinds of sins and disbeliefs, etc.)

does that not contain an oath for someone who is mindful?

Is there not in this an oath becoming a man of sense

In these, can evidence not be found by those with understanding?

Is there in this an oath for one endowed with understanding

Truly in this is an oath for men of understanding

For one who has sense, these (items) are surely worth being sworn by.

Is there in this an oath for one with understanding?

Is in that an oath to (those) of (E) a mind

Considering all this - could there be, to anyone endowed with reason, a [more] solemn evidence of the truth

Is there in that an oath for a sensible person? (Literally: person owning sense)

There surely is an oath for thinking man

Is this not a sufficient oath for intelligent people

__Is there (not) in such an oath (enough assurance) for a man of sense?_

Is this not a sufficient oath for highly intelligent one?

Is this not a sufficient oath for highly intelligent one?

Isn’t there a convincing oath for an intelligent person?

Is all this ˹not˺ a sufficient oath for those who have sense?

Does this contain an oath for those of understanding?

Is there not in this a mighty oath for a man of sense

A profound oath, for one who possesses intelligence

is there not in [all] that an oath for a rational person?

Is there within that an oath for a possessor of a mentality?

Is not all this a solemn evidence for every thinking person

Truly in that there is an oath for those who possess understanding

Is there not in it strong evidence for one possessed of understanding

Is there (not) in these a Sign for those who understand

does that not contain an oath for someone who is mindful?

Is there in this an oath for a man of sense?

Is there in this an oath for a rational person

is there an oath therein for one who is mindful

Is there in that an oath for a possessor of understanding?

Is there [not] in [all] that an oath [sufficient] for one of perception

is there not in this strong evidence for a man of sense

Is there (not) in these an adjuration (or evidence) for those who understand