Home
Hadith
Hadith 35249
Malik related to me that he had heard that Umar ibn al-Khattab or
Uthman ibn Affan gave a judgement about a slave woman who misled a man
about herself and said that she was free. He married her and she bore
children. It was decided that he should ransom his children with their
like of slaves.
Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "To
ransom them with their price is more equitable in this case, Allah
willing."
Muwatta Malik Book 36, Hadith 33
← Previous Hadith
Malik related to me from Yahya ibn Said from Sulayman ibn Yasar
that Umar ibn al-Khattab used to attach the children of the Jahiliyya
to whoever claimed them in Islam. Two men came and each of them
claimed a woman's child. Umar ibn al-Khattab summoned a person who
scrutinized features and he looked at them. The scrutinizer said,
"They both share in him." Umar ibn al-Khattab hit him with a whip.
Then he summoned the woman, and said, "Tell me your tale." She said,
"It was this one (indicating one of the two men) who used to come to
me while I was with my people's camels. He did not leave me until he
thought and I thought that I was pregnant. Then he left me, and blood
flowed from me, and this other one took his place. I do not know from
which of them the child is." The scrutinizer said, "Allah is greater."
Umar said to the child, "Go to whichever of them you wish." Muwatta Malik Book 36, Hadith 32
Next Hadith →
Yahya said that he heard Malik say, "The way of doing things
generally agreed upon in our community in the case of a man who dies
and has sons and one of them claims, 'My father confirmed that so-and-
so was his son,' is that the relationship is not established by the
testimony of one man, and the confirmation of the one who confirmed it
is only permitted as regards his own share in the division of his
father's property. The one testified for is only given his due from
the share of the testifier."
Malik said, "An example of this
is that a man dies leaving two sons, and 600 dinars. Each of them
takes 300 dinars. Then one of them testifies that his deceased father
confirmed that so-and-so was his son. The one who testifies is obliged
to give 100 dinars to the one thus connected. This is half of the
inheritance of the one thought to be related, had he been related. If
the other confirms him, he takes the other 100 and so he completes his
right and his relationship is established. His position is similar to
that of a woman who confirms a debt against her father or her husband
and the other heirs deny it. She must pay to the person whose debt she
confirms, the amount according to her share of the full debt, had it
been confirmed against all the heirs. If the woman inherits an eighth,
she pays the creditor an eighth of his debt. If a daughter inherits a
half, she pays the creditor half of his debt. Whichever women confirm
him, pay him according to this.
Malik said, "If a man's
testimony is in agreement with what the woman testified to, that so-
and-so had a debt against his father, the creditor is made to take an
oath with one witness and he is given all his due. This is not the
position with women because a man's testimony is allowed and the
creditor must take an oath with the testimony of his witness, and take
all his due. If he does not take an oath, he only takes from the
inheritance of the one who confirmed him according to his share of the
debt, because he confirmed his right and the other heirs denied it. It
is permitted for him to confirm it." Muwatta Malik Book 36, Hadith 34