Do they not reflect? Their companion has no madness; but he is a clear warner.

Has it not occurred to them that their companion is not mad but is giving clear warning

Do they not reflect (think)? There is not any madness in their companion (Muhammad). He is not but a plain Warner.

Reflect they not that in their companions there is no madness! he is naught but a manifest warner

Have they not bethought themselves their companion is not mad? He is only a plain admonisher

Did they not give thought? There is no madness (mindlessness) in their companion! He is only a clear warner.

Do they not ponder that there is no relation of insanity to their companion? He is only a warner manifests.

Have they not reflected? Their companion is not mad. He is only a clear warner.

And do they not reflect (by all that they witness in the Messenger and the Revelations coming to him) that there is no madness in their companion (the Prophet Muhammad)? He is but a plain warner

Have they not reflected that there is no madness in their companion, [and that] he is just a manifest warner

Have they not reflected (so that they may see) that their comrade (Muhammad) has no vestige of insanity but is a plain Warner

Have they not reflected? No madness is in their comrade; he is naught but a plain warner

Or did they not think that their friend is not mad? He is only a clear warner.

Have they ever given thought to the intention of their friend (Mohammad)? He is not crazy; he is only a plain Warner

Do they not reflect? Their companion is not seized with madness, he is only a clear warner

Do not they reflect Not in their companion [of] (is) any madness Not he (is) but a warner clear

Did they not then ponder, there is no undue fanaticism in their companion (i.e., the Prophet goes not beyond limits while he preaches). He is not but an evident warner

Reflect they not? There is no madness in their companion. He is but a clear warner.

Have they not reflected that the Messenger (blessings and peace be upon him), who honours them with (his) companionship, has not contracted any mania? He is only a plain Warner (to the disobedient)

Do they not ponder? Their companion, (Muhammad, SAW) does not have an affliction. Rather, he is (truly and) clearly a warner

Do they not then reflect that their companion is not possessed? he is but an obvious warner

Do they not ponder that their companion is far removed from insanity? In fact he is clearly a Herald of Warning

And have they not reflected. There is no madness in their companion. He is but a warner most evident.

Do they not consider that there is nothing of insanity about their companion? He is only a plain warner

Do they not then reflect that their companion is not possessed? He is but a perspicuous Warner

Have they not reflected? There is no madness in their companion, he is but a plain warner

Do they not reflect? There is no madness in their companion (Muhammad SAW). He is but a plain warner

Have they not thought things over? There is no madness in their companion (Muhammad); he is merely a plain warner.

Will they not bethink them that their companion Muhammad is not djinn-possessed? Yes, his office is only that of plain warner

Do they not realize that their companion [the Prophet] is not crazy? He is only a lucid warner.

Have they not pondered that their companion [i.e. the Prophet Muhammad] is not afflicted with insanity? He is only a plain warner

Do they not reflect (that) there is no madness in their companion? He is only a plain warner

Have they not reflected? Their companion is not under the influence of a jinn, he is but a clear warner.

Do they not reflect that their companion is not unsound in mind? He is only a plain warner

Did they not think (that there is) no insanity/madness with their companion/friend, that he (is) except (a) clear/evident warner/giver of notice

Has it, then, never occurred to them that there is no madness whatever in [this] their fellowman? He is only a plain warner

And do they not meditate? There is no madness in their Companion. (The Prophet) Decidedly he is nothing except an evident warner.

Have they not bethought them (that) there is no madness in their comrade? He is but a plain warner

Why will they not understand that their companion (Muhammad) is not possessed by jinn. (Muhammad) is only a (Divinely) authorized preacher

Have they not reflected that their fellow (i.e. the Holy Prophet) does not suffer from any madness? He is but a plain warner

Do they not reflect? There is nothing of insanity about their companion. He is not more than a perspicuous warner.

Do they not reflect? There is no madness in their companion. He is only sent to give sufficient warnings (about how to avoid Hellfire)

Have they not thought it through? There is no madness in their companion; he is a clear warner

Have they not ever given it a thought? Their fellow man is not insane. He is only sent with a clear warning.

Do they not reflect? There is no madness in their companion, he is only a clear warner.

Has it never occurred to them that their compatriot¹ is no madman, but one who gives clear warning

Why do they not reflect upon their friend (the messenger)? He is not crazy. He is simply a profound warner.

Has it never occurred to them that their companion [referring to the Prophet] is not mad but is giving them clear warning?

Have they not thought? That there is no madness in their friend. He is not except obvious Warner.

Has it never occurred to them that there is no madness whatever in their fellow-man? He has lived a whole life among you (10:16). He is only a plain Warner

Do they not reflect that their companion has not unsoundness in mind; he is only a plain warner

Do they not consider that there is nothing of insanity about their companion? He is only a plain warner

Do they not think (deeply)? Their companion (the Prophet) is not taken by madness: He is only a clear (and an unmistakable) Warner

Have they not thought things over? There is no madness in their companion; he is merely a plain warner.

Or don’t they think? There is no madness in their friend. He is but a transparent warner.

Do they not think? There is no madness in their friend. He is but a plain warner

Have they not reflected? There is no madness in their companion. He is naught but a clear warner

Do they not reflect? There is no madness in their companion? He is not except a clear warner.

Then do they not give thought? There is in their companion [Muhammad] no madness. He is not but a clear warner

Have they not reflected that their companion is not mad? He is only a plain warner

Do they not reflect? Their companion is not seized with madness: he is but a perspicuous warner